HC gag order unprecedented, will challenge it in SC, says Andhra govt advisor

Written by Sreenivas Janyala
| Hyderabad |

Updated: September 16, 2020 4:38:19 pm

Sajjala Reddy, Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati land purchase, Andhra HC media gag, Andhra HC Amravati land order, Amravati Andhra newsSajjala Reddy said the FIR was filed by an agency which is the Anti-Corruption Bureau and it did not contain anything that violated the privacy of the persons named in it. (Express photo)

Sajjala Ramakrishna Reddy, a Cabinet-rank leader who is designated as Advisor to the Andhra Pradesh Government (Public Affairs), said the Andhra Pradesh High Court’s gag order Tuesday night was “unprecedented” and the state will challenge it in the Supreme Court shortly.

A Bench of Chief Justice J K Maheshwari issued an order Tuesday night not to report an FIR filed by the AP Anti-Corruption Bureau against a former legal officer and others over land purchase in Amaravati.

“Our party and government feel that Tuesday night’s order by the court, that too a top court, is unprecedented. We have never seen or heard of this kind of order before. Normally, we see governments trying to muzzle the media or bringing in laws to put curbs on the media. When that happens, we have seen that courts have come forward to safeguard the rights of the media. After the High Court’s order Tuesday night, we are left wondering how the situation has changed so drastically,’’ Ramakrishna Reddy told The Indian Express.

He said the FIR was filed by an agency which is the Anti-Corruption Bureau and it did not contain anything that violated the privacy of the persons named in it.

Read | Setback for Andhra govt, high court stays SIT probe into Amaravati irregularities

“There is nothing in the FIR that might have immediately punished those named in it. The only information is that some persons with influence purchased land. So the hurried response by the court in issuing a gag order sets a new precedent,’’ he said.

“We get the feeling that there is one justice for the common man and another for someone who was a former legal official. The fairness and equality that our courts are known for comes under scrutiny. Instead of dwelling on whether a wrong has been committed or not, the court accepted the petitioner’s contention that the FIR was politically motivated and borne out of revenge, and issued the gag order… We are unable to comprehend how as soon as the FIR was filed, the court issued a gag order. We ask whether there is any objectivity in it. We hope that the judges introspect on this order,’’ he said.

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Post

What are clone trains? Indian Railways to run 20 pairs of new special trains soon; know everything about them

Wed Sep 16 , 2020
These clone trains will be fully reserved trains and will run on notified timings. Clone trains for Indian Railways’ passengers! Now, getting confirmed tickets will be easier with the commencement of more IRCTC special trains. Indian Railways has decided to run 20 pairs of clone special train services from 21 […]